Talk:Lou Reed (album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lour72.jpg
Image:Lour72.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Great work! Good article.
I really like the "Cross-Reference" box, with its "Remarks" section. Let's keep that! It's "Good Article"-type stuff.

Thing is, Lou Reed is a relatively poor album and an overall failure, in many people's opinions, including mine (and I'm a BIG Lou Reed fan!) so this article isn't likely to get a lot of attention. But there's no shame in having a great article about a mediocre piece of work.

I think if everybody who cares gives the Lou Reed articles a little TLC, some of them could achieve "Good Article" status. Just like some of Lou's albums are great American masterpieces of songwriting. I think Reed is every bit as important as Pink Floyd (let me be honest: He's more important; more artistically influential and personally intriguing), and look at the attention they get on Wikipedia!

That's about it -- I could talk about the album itself for a few paragraphs, but that's not the purpose of these Talk pages. Good work, contributors, and I hope to contribute positively to some Lou Reed articles myself, before the year is over.

--Ben Culture (talk) 05:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)