Talk:Lough Gara

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Lough Gara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5QE8rvIqH to http://www.birdlife.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lough Gara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071119030333/http://www.discoveryprogramme.ie/controller?action=stories_browse&id=1096&gid=48 to http://www.discoveryprogramme.ie/controller?action=stories_browse&id=1096&gid=48

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Iron Age Crannog -> need ref
I came across this article and I wonder why someone after more than ten years thinks that there is no source given for the age of the crannogs. But it clearly states: An article on Iron Age Crannogs in Lough Gara was published in Archaeology Ireland (Volume 14 No.2 Issue No.52 Summer 2000) .... To me that is a source (I checked and found it to be okay). Maybe the form for the citation is not as it should be, but that is another matter. To put this tag at nearly every second sentence (so it seems), has put me off the english wikipedia and maybe others too. Maybe whoever tags statements checks first, if the tag is justified. To me it definitely is not justified here.--Wanfried-Dublin (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)