Talk:Louis, Duke of Guyenne

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Requested move 30 September 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. EdJohnston (talk) 02:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

– Each was Dauphin of Viennois, not of France. The title is longer than necessary in any case. "Duke of Guyenne" and "Duke of Touraine" are the better and more useful identifiers. Srnec (talk) 23:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Louis, Dauphin of France, Duke of Guyenne → Louis, Duke of Guyenne
 * John, Dauphin of France, Duke of Touraine → John, Duke of Touraine
 * Support. I don't think there's much difference between Dauphins; as far as I know, the terms are generally treated as interchangeable. The stronger argument for the move is that the title can be more concise yet still precise, natural and recognizable by removing the additional, disputed disambiguator. So, the shorter title would meet at least one more of the WP:AT criteria compared to the current titles, which are not concise, and (more arguably) neither very recognizable nor natural. DrKiernan (talk) 08:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.