Talk:Louis-René Villermé/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 06:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

I propose to take on this review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

First reading
This article is in general well written, well referenced and reasonably comprehensive. It meets most of the GA criteria and I have listed a few points below. It seems to be part of a student project and the nominator has not edited since 2 May and may have moved on to other things. It should be possible to bring this article to GA standard even if the nominator is unresponsive.
 * The lead is rather short. It should not be necessary to have citations in the lead because the lead should be summarising content in the main body of text (where they should be cited), and should not include any facts not mentioned elsewhere.
 * "This work served not only as valuable information to medical institutions and boards, but also as a widely received social statement by the public." - This sentence is difficult to understand, could you rephrase it.
 * That's all for now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * There has been no response to my brief review, so I have done some editing to the article with regard to the points I made, and I believe it now meets the GA criteria so I am passing it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)