Talk:Louis Mendes

NYT
This article needs a lot of work. That said, this edit puzzles me. "this article has only 3 refs and all are from the one source". Only the first, most general assertion is referenced (and they're referenced via three bits of the NYT). This isn't satisfactory; but what's unsatisfactory about exclusive use of the NYT, Lopifalko? (Or do I misunderstand?) -- Hoary (talk) 23:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)


 * That edit removed the "Single source" warning. I pointed out that "all are from the one source" to show why that warning should remain. (Or is it me that is misunderstanding your question?) -Lopifalko (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * As I view the edit, it adds the "single source" warning. I think that at least one of us is misunderstanding something. (Or conceivably at least one of the browsers we use is displaying something perversely.) Still, we can agree that, problematic though it is, the article now has more than one source. -- Hoary (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Oh, my fault! I have always interpreted "single source" to mean sourced only to one author or organisation – a single source for the refs, rather than a single ref. For example here the single source being The New York Times. I stand corrected. -Lopifalko (talk) 08:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)