Talk:Louis Michel Antoine Sahuc

Untitled

 * Pretty good - I've omitted the detailed regimental strengths, because they just seemed to break up the flow of the text and make the text hard to read. One missing citation - right at the end, about the Arc de Triomphe - and two confusing ones; refs #3 and #4 are to "Arnold", but it's not clear if this is Marengo & Hohenlinden (2005) or Napoleon Conquers Austria (1995), both of which are in the bibliography. Shimgray | talk | 21:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for assessing this article and catching my goof-ups. I removed one of the Arnold refs, thus removing any ambiguity. It was never used anyway. The strength numbers did seem to be awkward. A few months ago, one editor (I think Ian Rose, but I may be mistaken) chided me for using the form "Author, p 100" so I changed it to "Author, 100". Now I see you like my original form better. Is there a published standard for citations? Djmaschek (talk) 04:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)