Talk:Louis XVIII/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments
I've done a quick initial read through and the article appears to be at or about GA-standard, as it is well referenced and illustrated; that said, the [[WP:Lead] needs cleaning up as it is currently confusing.

I will now do a more detailed review, section by section, but leaving the Lead until last. That this point I will mostly be concentrating on "problems". So if a section is not mentioned, its probably OK; but I will provide an overall summary at the end. Pyrotec (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Early life -
 * Looks OK. Pyrotec (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)


 * At his brother's court & Exile -
 * These two sections look OK. Pyrotec (talk) 21:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

overalll summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the qaulity of the article. I'm award it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 16:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)