Talk:Louise Mabulo

Semi-protected edit request on 31 August 2021
Remove controversy section due to unreliable sources from opinion pieces, not confirmed news, malicious intent in including non factual information. 77TynyCae (talk). Bayanihan 00:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 00:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 31 August 2021 (2)
Change "In 2021, Mabulo's The Cacao Project was exposed as "fake", "exploits farmers", and "for-profit" by several social media content creators including Nas Daily and Project Nightfall. Nas explained that when they intended to feature Mabulo's project, they discovered on-ground that the cacao plants "were tiny and all dying" and that the only healthy cacao crops were those in the land of the Mabulo clan.[18] Nas further concluded that "there was no story" in The Cacao Project and that the awards it received were "just awards" as the 200 farmers claimed by Mabulo does not exist Mabulo's former classmate also called the project "not a social enterprise" as the land was owned by the Mabulo family." to "In 2021, Mabulo engaged in an online debacle with vlogger Nas Daily, which was investigated by the Philippine Commission on Human Rights for Nas Daily's behaviour and exploitation against Filipinos."

Language in original post is biased and one sided. Based on speculative unconfirmed information, when existing sources also refute claims Section only includes claims sourced from opinion piece vlog, not reputable confirmed source. 77TynyCae (talk). Bayanihan 01:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the whole section on "Controversy" should be removed, as well as the tags. The claims of The Cacao Project being fake have only one source and is a disputed one (the opinion of a vlogger). The original article had over 10 references, but now some of the tags are saying that "it needs more sources". I think it's against the reliable sources policy to accept the opinion of a vlogger to be of more weight than other of the references being added here (such as the UN or Forbes, to name a few). There's a clear intention to discredit the work that Louise has been doing and there might be a conflict of interest on the user doing some of these edits (the user has been editing the Tagani article which I understand is a competitor of Louise's work). This looks more like a personal attack on Louise and I'm afraid it might be against the BLP policies. Scann (talk) 13:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)