Talk:Louise Milligan

Requested revdel
The WP:REVDEL requested by User:Sennecaster is wrongly reasoned. The paragraph in the text was not lifted from a Guardian article but, as the provided citation showed, from the ABC which was then also quoted in the Guardian. I don't think including the ABC statement varbatim in whole was a good edit – it should be summarized – but I don't see the need for a revdel. I suggest to remove the request. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

It's overquote, immediate, and recent. grounds for RD1 under policy, and it's one revision. it's egregious since the whole edit is a wholesale paste. Sennecaster  ( What now? ) 16:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)