Talk:Louisenthal Paper Mill

Article name / proposed move
I was going to remove the unnecessary comma from the article name, but then started wondering why this has a German name in the first place. The start of lede refers to this with the literal English translation, 'Louisenthal paper mill', although I'm not sure where that's coming from (other than a dictionary). Meanwhile the company's website just calls them 'Louisenthal', from what I could find at least. So it's clear the article needs to be moved (to get rid of the comma), but it's less clear where to? My vote, assuming the article survives the current AfD process, would be to move it to just 'Louisenthal'. (Courtesy-tagging the creator ) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Please yes proceed Nippon 725 (talk) 15:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Not sure 'proceed' with what, but I'll take that as support for my suggestion of Louisenthal. I'll do that if the article survives. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Done. On reflection, I decided to move this to Louisenthal Paper Mill, that being the proper, full and specific name. I've also added a redir from Louisenthal; if other Louisenthal articles later appear, that redir can then be replaced with disambiguation page, and this article won't need to be moved again. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Nippon 725 (talk) 15:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Can you please help correcting the article
Hi everybody Can you please tell me what is the mistake So we can correct it I am a new Wikipedian please help correcting it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nippon 725 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The biggest problem, as flagged up by the maintenance tags, is that there are only two references, and they're both citing the company's own website, which is not enough to establish notability. You need to find references backing up every statement made, and also demonstrate significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, per WP:N... or use the ones another editor has kindly found and added to the deletion discussion. While this doesn't guarantee the article will be kept, it certainly improves its prospects considerably. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)