Talk:Louisiana's 2nd congressional district

Partisan bashing and using nomenclature fallacy in said interest
Objective political alignment(conservative vs progressive vs liberal) and party realignment are necessary to avoid disengenuine partisan bashing present in the previously accepted edit. the current text blames Modern Democrats for disenfranchisement while ignoring the absolute continuous role of conservatives and the objective role of the modern Republican party and multiple high quality references have deleted and ignored.

Michael Hahn = "Unionist"?
Why is Hahn listed in the list of reps as a Unionist? His bio page says he was elected to Congress as a Republican. --Jfruh (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Reflist
Why don't the footnotes appear with this article? They're in the editable version. Can someone fix this situation? Rammer (talk) 16:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louisiana's 2nd congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)