Talk:Lourinhã Formation

Proper Tables and such
The simply list format can work for small and relatively unnotable formations (And even then, it should be done properly.), but more important ones certainly deserve actual tables and what not. The list on this place is getting quite long, and these rocks are becoming slowly but surely quite important. I think it's about time we fix this thing up, list all the dubious taxa, get some images up, and such. But, I don't have the slightest idea how to make these tables, so I can't do it. Help, please?Capra walie (talk) 23:39, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quote marks?
Why does the name "Lourinhã formation" appear in quotes? Is this not an official name for the formation, or something? Ettinarius (talk) 15:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Removed the quote marks. Perhaps the ip eds who added them can explain? If it is no longer considered a formation - then provide refs and change. Vsmith (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lourinhã Formation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928122621/http://www.museulourinha.org/pt/Omateus/Papers/BonaparteMateus1999.pdf to http://www.museulourinha.org/pt/Omateus/Papers/BonaparteMateus1999.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928122602/http://www.museulourinha.org/pt/Omateus/Papers/Antunes%20%26%20Mateus%20%282003%29.pdf to http://www.museulourinha.org/pt/Omateus/Papers/Antunes%20%26%20Mateus%20%282003%29.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)