Talk:Louvre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Gonna review for GA -- Intothewoods29 (talk) 19:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Good job. I'm thinking it passed. I really liked how it was organized, good thinking. I fixed a few minor grammer things... Some suggestions for FA: I'd get rid of or move the reference to the Davinci code in "Third Empire to Present"... and I'd make sure to look reread it yourself, in case there's anything I missed. I'd also like a picture in the Paper section, since it's the only art section without a visual example.

GA PASS REQ.S:

1. It is well-written and is easy to read. Grammer is correct. It has an informative lead section, is free of jargon, thoroughly explains any little-known historical events, etcetera etc.

2.has references for everything, backs up any info. Contains no original research.

3.It stays on topic.

4.Totally NPOV

5.stable (pretty much lazulilasher, good job)

6.plenty of images that help a lot, with copyright tags and captions

Congrats. Now go out there and make this an FA! Intothewoods29 (talk) 20:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)