Talk:Love, Lies (2016 film)

Requested move 7 April 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 22:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Love, Lies (2016 film) → Love, Lies – This title is significantly different. All the other titles are called "Love Lies", while this title has a comma. JE98 (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * To many people a stray comma is not very rememberable. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose Still too easily confused. Saying a single comma makes it "significantly different" doesn't exactly help the credibility of the argument being presented.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The comma does change the meaning from either a noun and verb, or an adjective and noun, to a noun and a noun. Station1 (talk) 22:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose – A comma is not a great disambiguator. Dicklyon (talk) 04:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Support, per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Nine Zulu queens (talk) 09:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose, ironically per WP:SMALLDETAILS (this is a classic example of exactly what WP:SMALLDETAILS should prevent). In ictu oculi (talk) 20:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose per In ictu oculi. Too easily confused. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.