Talk:Love-in-idleness

Merge into Pansy
I think that this article should be merged (in reduced form) into Pansy - there's just not enough material or significance for it to stand alone. Comments? - Wormcast (talk) 21:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I would agree there's not much there, but even the claim that it is a pansy was notcited to any any reliable source. I had to remove a fair amount of the article because it appeared to be original thoughts of the contributor. DreamGuy (talk) 20:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)