Talk:LoveStoned/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Review
Hey, I'm reviewing the article. Best. — R  2  00:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Lead

 * "including reaching" - bad wording.
 * Removed "reaching".
 * Good

Background

 * Redundant use of the word "also".
 * Got it.
 * "in regards of the unexpected switch" - bad wording.
 * "the back story behind the song" - bad wording.
 * Do you have suggestions for both?
 * Done

Reception

 * "The song received positive reception" - Not needed, the reader can make up their own minds from the reviews presented.
 * "upon release it was downloaded 39,000 times" - Should go in the chart performance section
 * Done [on both].
 * Good

Chart performance

 * "The track reached the top 10 in less than 7 European countries" - Odd way of putting it.
 * Do I remove it?
 * Not sure why you need to say "position" all the time, remove a few.
 * I think I got it.
 * Any info on certifications/sales anywhere?
 * Nope, no certifications.
 * All good.

Music vid

 * "The video was directed by Robert Hales" - Stubby, join to another sentence.
 * I think I know what you mean, but I want to be sure.
 * Done, I aloo removed the attribution of the newspaper because it's hardly a controversial issue.

Charts

 * There are several unsourced charts on there, you should be able to find situations.
 * Done.

Final comments

 * Regarding "The song includes a string section" of the lead, which part of the song is this in, or is it in both parts?
 * Its in both parts.

OK, well the article is good now, so it passes :) — R  2  14:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  14:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)