Talk:Love & Gravity/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Hello editors. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. Check back a little later for an analysis. Tim meh  ( review me ) 22:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The fair use screenshots don't look like they have a purpose here. They shouldn't be here unless they exemplify something further than the text could, and there isn't even any text describing the music videos.


 * The references aren't formatted consistently. They should all have access dates and the publishers should be wikilinked.


 * There aren't any sources for the chart positions. There needs to be a reliable source for each. See Record charts for a list of good archive sites.


 * Upon quick scanning, the article looks lacking in sources, and I see a large amount of CMT lyrics pages cited. More on this later... Tim  meh  ( review me ) 22:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * This article is definitely lacking in sources. I see three whole paragraphs that are completely unsourced. Every claim of fact must cite a reliable source. The article is also a bit quote-heavy. This shows in the references. About a third of them are to song lyrics.


 * I suggest merging the "tracks" and "singles" sections. There's no need to have a separate section just to describe the singles. Also, the track-by-track descriptions need to be shortened and summarized. The section is too long as is. The article setup seems a bit odd to me as well. Take a look at Album for an idea of what the main points of the article should be.


 * It's going to take a lot of work on your part, as these are major issues, but I'll give you a chance to bring this up to GA quality. I'm going to put the article on hold for now so you have a chance to work on it and fix the issues. I'll give you a few days to get the issues dealt with. Tim  meh  ( review me ) 02:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I've been very busy lately. I don't know when I'll be able to address these issues but I will address them eventually.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I'm going to have to fail this. It's been 26 days since I put the review on hold, and the normal allowance is only a week. Feel free to resubmit it to WP:GAN when you've addressed my concerns. Tim  meh  23:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)