Talk:Love jihad conspiracy theory

A question to editors
How, on earth, is this a conspiracy theory? please show me your facts. i live in a state (not american) that has had OBVIOUS signs of love jihad (a form of new warfare intended to convert vulnerable girls and boys into islam through love from members of islam. they may go to another country to fight the religious war or remain in their own country). so i request you to emove the 'conspiracy theory' badge from this article. also, why is it shown a just a few ultra nationalsts or hindutvas, etc are causing such claims? fine, it may not be heard about where you are from or where the authors of your cited news articles are from but in states such as mine we DO have such things (most cases against them get quashed here mostly due to communism) General Phoenix (talk) 14:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Per the FAQ at the top of this page, "The consensus of high-quality academic sources is that Love Jihad is a conspiracy theory or fabricated claim. Please see for the list. Wikipedia articles are based on reliable sources, and not original research. The unwarranted promotion of fringe theories is not allowed on Wikipedia." —  Newslinger  talk   01:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * that, is not a proper answer sir, could you please give a direct reply. General Phoenix (talk) 15:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia, as a matter of long established consensus policy, bases its article content on published reliable sources. This article follows such sources. And that is the only answer you are going to get, since such policy is not open to debate here. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You asked for evidence showing that love jihad is a conspiracy theory, and the FAQ directly responds to your question with a link to the cited reliable sources that provide this evidence: . Most of the sources listed in that citation bundle are high-quality academic sources, not news sources. An unsupported claim such as "we DO have such things" is original research and cannot be cited on Wikipedia, because it is not verifiable. —  Newslinger  talk   18:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * "The unwarranted promotion of fringe theories is not allowed on Wikipedia"- proceeds to pick sources from news articles like financial times and journalists that can be paid off.
 * Of all the sources you've just listed and claim to be "reliable","high quality academic sources" - the only studied sources are from studies that have to use the word "Islamophobia".
 * It's like asking Osama if he thinks Christianity is more real than Islam(Osama has a degree in civil engineering), and then accepting his answer as an academic source. Glad he's dead or else Wikipedia would probably term him as a freedom fighter instead of a terrorist. 45.117.251.90 (talk) 18:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The high-quality academic sources cited in include works authored by professors of relevant fields, including religious studies and political science. Subject-matter experts have concluded that love jihad is an anti-Muslim (i.e. Islamophobic) conspiracy theory. Your comment alleges that the cited sources are biased or "paid off", but presents no evidence backing your allegations. Please review the verifiability policy, reliable sources guideline, and fringe theories guideline to become familiar with Wikipedia's article content standards. —  Newslinger   talk   09:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Minor edit request
Hi,

I think it would be appropriate to put a link to this page on the word "kidnapping" in the first sentence, I would appreciate it if someone with the perms could do so as it would provide some more context in the introductory paragraph.

(Glad to see this is protted; there are literal crores of potential single-purpose COI editors for whom this could be a major whitewashing magnet, who actually believe in magical Muslim men who can instantly seduce any hot Hindu girls within a 10-km radius by... offering them a ride home on their cycles?) EditVerifier (talk) 02:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅. Wiki linked "kidnapping" → Bride kidnapping as requested. • Gene93k (talk) 04:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

A recent development
TrangaBellam (talk) 17:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)