Talk:Luís Filipe Vieira

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Luís Filipe Vieira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230233556/http://relvado.sapo.pt/benfica/vieira-concorre-sozinho-eleicoes-benfica to http://relvado.sapo.pt/benfica/vieira-concorre-sozinho-eleicoes-benfica
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111125001108/http://www1.ionline.pt/conteudo/59021-benfica-campeao to http://www1.ionline.pt/conteudo/59021-benfica-campeao
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161013125546/https://www.publico.pt/noticia/vieira-reeleito-na-presidencia-do-benfica-com-83-dos-votos-1569011 to https://www.publico.pt/noticia/vieira-reeleito-na-presidencia-do-benfica-com-83-dos-votos-1569011
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202234536/http://relvado.sapo.pt/benfica/benfica-vieira-ja-presidente-com-mais-tempo-442780 to http://relvado.sapo.pt/benfica/benfica-vieira-ja-presidente-com-mais-tempo-442780

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
you should not be | editing this article per conflict of interest: Draft:John Textor. Moreover, you should not remove information provided by reliable secondary sources. SLBedit (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Apologies for deleting your prior Talk comments. I was unaware of how to resolve a Conflict of Interest allegation. So, I will repeat my original response the was previously submitted as an edit: Respectfully, the fact that I wrote an initial draft of a Biography (and a Wiki biography of Textor) does not meet the definition of a conflict of interest. My work has led me to become well informed on John Textor. That is not a conflict of interest, especially as it relates to an article on Vieira which contains incorrect information. Also, subsequent reporting from the same sources as your citations of Sol have cleared up the CMVM reporting issues. The purchase was not closed.

Aftermath
Anything that is directly related to his Benfica presidency or his alleged theft of Benfica's money shouldn't go into his personal life section, but to "Benfica presidency aftermath". Remember that he still is notable for his presidency of Benfica, not for being a fake benfiquista. Vieira appeared at the club's elections because he is a former president who was forced to leave the club (he didn't want to). Therefore, it has nothing to do with his personal life. Regarding the Portuguese Cup, Benfica didn't lose the 2021 final twice, and this is what you wrote. SLBedit (talk) 19:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Like I explained on my edit, that election sentence is not related with his presidency tenure, since it happened after he resigned. Vieira voted as a sócio, not for being the former president (the same can be said for Manuel Vilarinho). Thus, that sentence has something to do with is personal life, yes: after resignation, he, the citizen Vieira, as a paying supporter, continued to participate in the club's life. The question here should be: since it is more personal than related to his time as president, is that sentence even worth mentioning on the article? Anyway, when I made my changes, there was no Benfica presidency aftermath section, and it made more sense for it to be in the Personal life one.
 * As for the grammar edits, I did not read the "for a second time in a row" part on the Taça de Portugal, so after seeing it, I agree that the indefinite article is correct. But for the other one, I find your "season's" addition to be utterly pointless. Since the whole paragraph is only about one season, there is no need to state that the Super Taça was that season's [Super Taça] (the following sentence even starts with "Considered a failed, disastrous season", so it is obvious the previous sentence was also exclusively referring to 2020/1). Sometimes, less is more. Besteirense (talk) 21:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * First of all, thank you for explaining your edits, I appreciate it. Yes, the elections happened after his resignation, but shortly after he resigned. While I said his appearance has nothing to do with his personal life, it's true that his appearance can also be seen as something personal, like you explained, although, in my view, it has more to do with the fact that he was forced to resign (he seemed butthurt). I think his controversial and notable sentence should be included because Benfica has always been a democratic club, and Vieira still doesn't understand that, even after spending 18 years as club president. About the Super Cup, your edit makes sense and sounds right/natural in Portuguese, but in my opinion it doesn't seem to be the case in English. Anyway, I have removed "season's" and left "match" ("Super Cup final", or simply "Super Cup", doesn't feel right, as it implies it's a tournament, and you can't lose a trophy you didn't win in the first place). SLBedit (talk) 21:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Linking of finance terms
Finance-related words should be linked because not everyone knows what they mean. SLBedit (talk) 16:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)