Talk:Lucca Ashtear/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 22:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

I will be taking this article since I think it meets the requirements needed to become a GA but I'll do the review during this weekend.Tintor2 (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Some stuff that might be better suited: Lead and Infobox'
 * The infobox lacks an alt.
 * Fixed, though an alt is only required for FAC (not a bad suggestion though)
 * Curious about it. Did Square never mention the characters' creator? Maybe Masato Katō?
 * I tried to find details on who made the characters, but apparently multiple people were responsible for different characters and it doesn't specify who was responsible for Lucca.
 * I did a bit of check up in the infobox to focus where she was introduced
 * I'm not sure what you mean?
 * Doesn't the second paragraph lack a mention about her creation? A small sentence would be enough. Maybe you could tone down the reception area from paragraph to balance it.
 * Added an extra detail on creation to the first paragraph.

Concept and creation
 * "ile Lucca uses magic, she also often uses weaponry, such as a hammer, gun, flamethrower, and bombs." Sounds a bit trivial unless the creators wanted to highlight this.
 * Removed
 * "swing that way." If that was in the Japanese version, then it might be better to paraphrase unless a writer mentions it.
 * The translation of the text to "swing that way" comes from the source attached.

Appearances
 * Not necessary but gamefaqs has the entire game script. It might be useful to cite everything.
 * GameFAQs is not considered a reliable source as it were; however, it should be noted that beyond sourcing to verify that she did actually appear in the games being discussed, that the other text need not be sourced.
 * Same with Quest
 * Above

Reception
 * "Lucca's depression by Robo" this could be expanded a bit.
 * I moved that part to the section on the accident so that it is given greater context.
 * The merchandise section is a bit small. I would merge it with the reception.
 * I moved this to the Appearances section, as someone informed me that it would work better there.

The rest is everything good. Nice work with the article. Just check those issues and I'll gladly pass it. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Issues have been addressed or responded to, let me know if they satisfy you. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 19:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

I meant placing the cite quote and then using the ones from gamefaqs to cite the game itself. Still, good work with the article. Congratulations.Tintor2 (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)