Talk:Lucifer Rising (Candlemass EP)

Massive sock puppets in Articles_for_deletion/Lucifer_Rising_(album)
As mentioned in the Afd:


 * Please note that four of these editors EastHills, A-Kartoffel, JoannaMinogue, JamesBurns are the same person, see: Sockpuppet investigations/JamesBurns/Archive

Ikip (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't think the article that was deleted was about the same album that is now at this title. Sockpuppet EastHills moved this page from Lucifer Rising (Candlemass album) after whatever was here was deleted. An admin will need to look at the deleted edit history and sort this out. DHowell (talk) 01:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move to Lucifer Rising (Candlemass album); no move for Lucifer Rising (Kaamos album). No evidence of primary topic for "Lucifer Rising". Candlemass album is helpful dabbing info in contrast to Kaamos album. Born2cycle (talk) 04:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Requested move
Lucifer Rising (album) → Lucifer Rising (EP) — The Candlemass release is explicitly refered to as an EP in the article text. On the other hand, if it is actually an album, it should be moved to Lucifer Rising (Candlemass album) to disambiguate with the Kaamos album, as there is no clear primary usage between the two. PC78 (talk) 18:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Lucifer Rising (Kaamos album) → Lucifer Rising (album)


 * Lucifer Rising (album) should be reditected to Lucifer Rising. Content should be moved to Lucifer Rising (Candlemass album) to disambiguate from Lucifer Rising (Kaamos album).--Labattblueboy (talk) 16:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * So it's not an EP in your view, then? PC78 (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * At least in the UK anyway. It's more than 4 tracks and well over 25 mins total.--Labattblueboy (talk) 18:52, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * As I read the article, 3 tracks + 9 bonus tracks. Or is that splitting hairs? PC78 (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If the sources call it an EP, I suppose it's an EP. Though 12 tracks (bonus or otherwise) seems too much for an EP for me.--Kotniski (talk) 17:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.