Talk:Lucille Ball/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article is missing some footnotes. This could be remedied, or else it may put its GA status at risk. Anything else I'm missing? --George Ho (talk) 05:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This article has been altered a great deal since I took it to a WP:GA status. There have been many additions to the article that I feel are not appropriate or even relevant. I do think its time for the article to be reassessed to bring it back up to the standards it was at when I was continually working on it. I would suggest that one looks first at all of the dead links or non reliable sources. I believe some of the sentence structuring has been compromised from its original formatting simply because of the amount of contribution to the page. I do not feel it will take much to get the article back into GA condition, but I do agree it needs to be done! --Canyouhearmenow 10:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

This appears to have been abandoned by the nominator so I will close it. No real reason concerning the GA criteria has been given for delisting so I will close it as keep. AIR corn (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relooking at this I jumped the gun. there are too many unreferenced paragraphs and tags on this article for it to be considered Good. Retroactively changing the close to Delist. AIR corn (talk) 01:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)