Talk:Lucille Cedercrans

Untitled
I've removed the db; we're working on the article. It will certainly be notable very soon. --  Chzz  ►  06:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay; I have made the article written less towards a Theosophist audience but added her into Category: Theosophists (which requires Categories: Esoterists, Mystics.) Unfortunately there is no 'Category: Perennial Philosophers,' because that precedes Theosophy and includes people that say things conservative Theosophists consider at least difficult/controversial.  People that agree with HPB's Esoteric Instructions but say ideas in there differently let alone add to them are often called wrong by Theosophists who apparently never read the parts of Esoteric Instructions.
 * That is why she is notable in New Age or whatever, though I explained the categories that generally are more classically Philosophical & specific than that. Maybe she is non-notable for a general encyclopedia, but I would prefer a vote and asking [| WP Occult] before deleting this.  Cedercrans is one Philosopher (on my 20 page list of ones I consider worth researching) that I have not got around to reading in-depth yet, but she is in the highest middle part of my to-read list of modern ones.Dchmelik (talk) 07:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lucille Cedercrans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704055602/http://www.wisdomimpressions.com/newslet/Lucille.htm to http://www.wisdomimpressions.com/newslet/Lucille.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)