Talk:Luck and fate in Middle-earth/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 05:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Another Tolkien GAN! I will be able to review this later today.  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 05:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * There we go! Okay, this review is on the shorter side, but the article is quite well-written, and a large portion of the text is attributed quotations which naturally cannot be changed.  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 19:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * : Super. All done to date. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Great work as always! I am now pleased to pass this article for GA status. Congrats!  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 20:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyvio check
Earwig says good to go. The quotations are used appropriately in-line with WP:COPYQUOTE.
 * Noted.

File
The image used is relevant, of acceptable quality and copyright-free:
 * : valid public domain rationale.


 * Noted.

Prose

 * I would wikilink luck and fate in the lead as both are wikilinked later in the body.
 * Done.


 * "that the Valar resemble angels in Christianity" – wikilink to angels in Christianity; I reckon both angels and Christianity are commonly known enough definitions to not require a wikilink.
 * Actually there is a more specific article "Angels in Christianity" which does rather seem worth linking.


 * In the table, "Tries to command the Ring to return to him" is capitalised whilst none of the other sentences are.
 * Fixed.


 * "In addition, the leapfrogging of the timeline" – is leapfrogging the correct word? From what I could find it appears to be predominantly economics jargon.
 * It's quite usual in Britspeak.
 * Oh I see.


 * "Théoden's maxim just mentioned" – how about just "Théoden's maxim"? IMO the additional text is unnecessary.
 * Gone.


 * Add citations to the quote boxes.
 * Done.

Refs
Passes spotcheck on refs 1, 7, 12 and 16.
 * Noted.


 * Kreeft, Peter J. is a dead link.
 * Archived. Their whole website is down, probably just a glitch - it's been there since 2005.
 * I hope they get it working again.

Other
Short desc, section formatting, ALT text, navs, other templates and cats all good. Nice work!
 * Noted.