Talk:Luckin Coffee

Edit warring
User:ICookie a singlepurpose account is edit warring to introduce their own preferred version, I see no discussion about this here? Theroadislong (talk) 10:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * @Theroadislong Because I am not a WP:SPA. This account is over 10 years old and I had several edits on the Norwegian version of wikipedia that were made long ago. Admins are able to confirm all this.
 * And on the contrary, I see several complaints on the accounts of @Questar, @scope_creep and @MrOllie who recently reversed my edits, including completely non-controversial edits such as sidebar data including revenue numbers, store-count etc on the article in question. Now if you have issues with my content, take it to the talk-page of the article in question.
 * The content you re-introduced included 'The company continued its rapid growth" which is promotional and also changed "bankruptcy" to "petition" when the the source actually says the former. Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Your account is three days old with your first edit being here . Theroadislong (talk) 11:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Look at the diff, the "rapid growth" part has been there a long time. You are free to remove it, as those aren't my words.
 * My account is far older, I have several edits on Norwegian wiki that admins can confirm, although it was a long time ago, including:
 * https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorbert_dose, https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Harold_Gray , https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_(enhet) , https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%85ndelig_oppf%C3%B8lger
 * If you note, I also pointed this out in the COIN discussion, if you would actually read it instead of being prejudiced and jumping to conclusions. ICookie (talk) 11:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Your edits on The Norwegian Wikipedia are irrelevant there is no connection. Theroadislong (talk) 11:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It disproves your point that I am WP:SPA and it disproves your lie that my account is only 3 days old. I deleted your comments here earlier because they break the WP:AFG and contain personal attacks. But for now I will leave them up for admins to see. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ICookie (talk • contribs) 12:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

I have read the long and tendentious wrangle on COIN - this contribution seems especially useful - and have reverted the last edit by User:ICookie. The matter is now at ANI. I suggest that further clean-up of this article, though long overdue, should await whatever admin intervention may eventuate. Hunc (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

On the restructuring plans...
I have readjusted and added to the content to integrate the accounting scandal into the the history section. However, I am stuck at writing the details of the restructuring plans as most of the sources pertaining to that are either the press releases, or other sources regurgitating the press releases. Any advice on this? Also, stating this up front, I have not seen any of the content by Icookie or any other editors who are/were purportedly/allegedly having COI, nor I know them personally or professionally to my best knowledge. The edits are done to update the article as much as possible in a npov manner. If there are any similarities, it is purely coincidental. – robertsky (talk) 18:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC)