Talk:Lucy Activewear

Start
A much better start! Don't forget to add references; they will help establish notability and are critical for writing a Wikipedia-worthy article. I did a quick Google search and found some good 3rd party references; try using those to keep a neutral point of view. Good luck! Vicenarian (talk) 17:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm always curious about these issues, having added a lot to the Dendreon page. An encyclopedia is not the yellow pages or the Thomas Directory or a public notice venue. It is hard to know where this stub will go but from looking at Alpine Electronics page, the immediate cue is puffery-this is a legal term for untestable claims ( too empty to be shown to be false ). Boasts, comparisons to nothing ( " costs less [ than what????]" ), etc are good cues. Unless their marketing plan creates a notable event, simply hyping a product is IMO not notable. Even "balance" doesn't accomplish anything if the events aren't of an "encyclopedic" nature ( whatever that means is up to Wiki but you can ask if you would find it in a print encyclopedia ) Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The notability guideline here is WP:CORP. As long as the article for a company is written in encyclopedic tone and cites sufficient third-party, verifiable sources, it should qualify under said guideline. And remember, it's potential we're looking for. Vicenarian (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)