Talk:Lucy Koh

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Lucy H. Koh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110604153141/http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2010/01/29_koh.nomination.html to http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2010/01/29_koh.nomination.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lucy H. Koh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100206222505/https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-nominates-five-serve-united-states-district-court-bench to http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-nominates-five-serve-united-states-district-court-bench
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://gov.ca.gov/press-release/8613/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Picture
Helo @Snickers2686

I see you changed the profile picture for Lucy Koh. I believe the original picture was a better picture then the new one. Are you sure the new picture is better? I did not put the picture on her page, but looking at it independently, I'm not sure the second picture improves the page. What do you think? ￼

MIAJudges (talk) 04:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * How is this not an improvement since this is an updated photo? The other one is seven years old. Snickers2686 (talk) 04:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

@ Snickers2686

The new picture doesn’t come out as clear as the original picture. When I clicked on the picture I actually thought something had happened to my computer screen. I went back to the old picture & it looks crystal clear. I didn’t see anything wrong with the original picture at all personally. Plus the older picture seems more professional.

MIAJudges (talk) 05:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)


 * What effect does a professional picture have on the article? Snickers2686 (talk) 17:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

@Snickers2686

I posted an updated picture for another nominee earlier this year & was told a newer picture does not replace a better quality older picture. I was also told I had to gain consensus if there was a dispute to change the picture & it was reverted back to the original. Plus as I said the second picture does not seem to have as good of quality as the original. Now I am not trying to take that route, just asking if you could take a look at the original picture & if you do not see anything wrong with it, perhaps we can just stick with that picture. I would be more than happy to add the picture you posted in her article if you like under the newer section for her being a circuit court nominee so both pictures can be on her page. What do you think about that?
 * MIAJudges (talk) 04:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)