Talk:Luddendenfoot

Requested move 14 January 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) NOT MOVED power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 04:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Luddendenfoot → Luddenden Foot – Correct name.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose - The village sign on the A646 lists it as Luddendenfoot, the school uses Luddendenfoot, newspapers refer to it as Luddendenfoot and the council refer to it as Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot Luddendenfoot - are all these wrong? Jeni  ( talk ) 19:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The usual local name for the place should be used not just looking at what the OS map uses which is often at odds with normal usage. Keith D (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * What 3rd party "outside" sources refer to a place as is generally more important than local/primary sources.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 21:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.