Talk:Ludwig Stumpfegger

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Contradiction
This article states that: "At Hitler's request, he administered a cyanide tablet to Blondi..." while the article on Werner Haase states that: "On 29 April he was summoned to the Führerbunker to administer poison to Hitler's dog Blondi, to ensure that the poison supplied by Dr Ludwig Stumpfegger was effective." Which one of them was it who actually gave the tablet? --Hydraton31 (talk) 21:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

The comment about cyanide at the end of the article seems suspicious to me. References are required if it is to be kept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.38.225 (talk) 09:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Well it's not really so much a contradiction as an ambiguity. Easily resolved. I fail to see what is "suspicious" about the cyanide comment. Paul B (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Unfairly blamed
It was actually Kunz who helped kill the Goebbels children. Stumpfegger was blamed because he was missing and presumed to have died. (86.172.137.199 (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC))