Talk:Luis A. Diaz

Review
I've been asked to review the article for conformance with Wikipedia's guidelines. I couldn't find any problems with it. Good-quality sources are used, with inline referencing throughout. The text corresponds to what the sources say, and I see no issues with neutrality. As far as notability is concerned, I see no problems either: WP:GNG is clearly met, and from what I can tell (I'm moderately familiar with the field of medicine), it would be at best really hard to argue against notability per WP:NACADEMIC. In particular, I'd say WP:NACADEMIC #1 (The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.) is met.

If I had to assess it, I'd say Start class - definitely not a stub - and perhaps not too far from C class. GregorB (talk) 16:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)