Talk:Luise Clayborn Kaish

WP:COI
At a Commons Undeletion Request today, User:Sarahcmccollum says that "I work for the Kaish family". . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 22:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Request for Removal of COI Template
I've done my best to stick to all of the advice posed in Wikipedia's "Plain and simple conflict of interest guide". And beyond that, as I am connected to a non-profit foundation, I feel that my role falls under one these guidelines for "Practices not regarded as COI" :

Consultants for mission-aligned organizations: When an organization like an educational non-profit – one that largely shares our mission of sharing knowledge – seeks someone to help facilitate an informal collaborative relationship, that is often a mutually beneficial situation. These positions may be for-profit. Be careful of areas where missions are not aligned. Avoid even the appearance of impropriety by limiting scope to mission-aligned areas and using full disclosure for any potential areas of concern. Employees at cultural and academic institutions: We want experts editing Wikipedia articles. Merely being employed by an institution is not a conflict of interest.

I hope that you can help by letting me know how best to resolve the COI label you've affixed to these articles, as I don't feel that it is merited. Thank you for your time. --Sarahcmccollum (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems to me the issue of COI has been adequately addressed. In particular the entries seem composed scholarly. Considering that there hasn't been any further comment against in more than one year, I propose removal after a couple of days for reactions.--Gciriani (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)