Talk:Luke Snellin

Quality of the references
I've tagged this article as having unreliable sources. A breakdown of issues with each reference:
 * 1) This may be linking to a copyright violation (seems to be a magazine scan)
 * 2) Is another possible copyright violation link, though comes from author's blog (therefore unreliable)
 * 3) This is actually a reliable source
 * 4) This appears to be a blog post rather than a magazine article
 * 5) Another possible copyright violation link to a blog
 * 6) Seems reliable but not very significant coverage
 * 7) Yet another possible copyright violation link
 * 8) A blog source

Overall the quality of these sources needs improvement & if the sources for the possible copyright violations can be found these could be used from the original source. -- Mrmatiko (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)