Talk:Luke Zachrich/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

I am afraid to say that I will have to quick fail the GA nomination on account of numerous failures with the relevant criteria at GA. In this case of this particular article, I noted several problems which stand in its way of achieving GA status at this time.

The primary issue is the sourcing of the article, with few of the sources being dead links and several of them lacking the dates they were published and who wrote them (where possible). The Mixed martial arts record tables at the bottom of the prose is not cited to a reliable source and also the championships and accomplishments section should be entirely referenced and not be just for one title and leave the rest uncited. There are a few sentences that do not a single reference to verify that the information is correct. The references in the lead are unneeded per MOS:CITELEAD and some of the prose is messy with some repetitive use of certain words in the same sentence and some non-encyclopedic language.

Also it appears that the nominator is not a main contributor to the article in terms of article creation and did not appear to consult with the main writers about whether the article should be nominated at GAN and how to improve the article further. I would strongly recommend that the nominator read up on articles on films that are currently at GA status for inspiration before this particular article can undergo further development before it is renominated at GAN for the second time. MWright96 (talk) 06:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)