Talk:Lumbar anterior root stimulator

Peer Review 1
1. Quality of Information: 2 - Solid information, well referenced.

2. Article size: 0 - Only ~7000 bytes. Need between 15,000 and 25,000 bytes.

3. Readability: 2 - Worded in terms such that a layperson would understand.

4. Refs: 2 - Meets minimum requirement set by Dr. Potter

5. Links: 1 - Only few terms are linked due to only half the article being present.

6. Responsive to comments: 2 - No comments are present.

7. Formatting: 2 - Arranged in sensible order.

8. Writing: 1 - Well written but needs more depth.

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2 - The real name was specified for the user account.

10. Outstanding?: 1 - A topic that has the chance to be well written and well referenced.

Total: 15/20

Skarthikeyan3 (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

1. Quality of Information: 1 - Not enough.

2. Article size: 0 - Not enough. Only contains 7,000 bytes.

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 1 - Only 2 or 3 links shown.

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 0 - Page does not exist.

10. Outstanding?: 1 - Not formatted well enough, but still acceptable.

_______________

Total: 13 out of 20

JoowonJun (talk) 2:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review 3
1. Quality of Information: 1 Referenced information, could be more thorough.

2. Article size: 0 Did not meet size requirement only 7,141 bytes

3. Readability: 2 The article was worded well

4. Refs: 2 Meets minimum of 10 references assigned by Dr. Potter

5. Links: 1 Few links, could use more

6. Responsive to comments: 1 No initial talk page

7. Formatting: 2 Formatting made sense and was easy to follow

8. Writing: 1 Article was well written but needs more content

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 0 Nothing really outstanding about this article

_______________

Total: 12 out of 20

AnishJ (talk) 23:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks to all the Peer Reviews. Good Luck on finals! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkasinadhuni3 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)