Talk:Lumbersexual

Redirect?
This article will probably be deleted or redirected. I recommend a soft-redirect to Wiktionary. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Completely coincidentally, I just searched for "lumbersexual" and forked over the content from the Lumberjack article, believing a separate article was justifiable based on the number of sources talking about the neologism. Only after forking the content did I see the redirect discussion. Yes, the article needs to be expanded, and I added some external links for additional context, but surely there are enough sources to justify an article. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Media culture, parodies?
«He's a lamberjack and he's ok…»? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.190.161.115 (talk) 05:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Notability
Flash in the pan. A tiny bit of usage, briefly, but this WP:NEO did not make the cut. WP:NOTDICTIONARY.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Notability doesn't expire, there are plenty of sources about this subject. even fairly recent ones  InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * , similar articles were tagged for notability even though the articles themselves showed in-depth discussion of the terms. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 21:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Then those tags were inappropriate as well, the policy in question can be found here: WP:NOTTEMPORARY. It is pretty clear on the subject. In any case, per my link, there IS ongoing coverage of this topic, so that policy isn't even needed here.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  21:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)