Talk:Lunar year

Merge?
should probably be merged with lunar calendar. dab (&#5839;) 08:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. Would the articles Year and Calendar be merged? I doubt. --Spring Dennis 06:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Another possibility is to merge with Month. Lunokhod 22:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Lunar year with Lunar calendar
Dbachmann has proposed that Lunar year be merged with Lunar calendar. Please give your opinions below.
 * not for any fundamental reason, just because the articles are similar in scope and both very short; if they should grow in size significantly, they can always be separated again. No big deal as far as I am concerned. dab (𒁳) 13:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * for the record, I had completely overlooked the fact that I had made the same proposal before, back in July 2005, just above. dab (𒁳) 20:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * For (weak): I support this proposal for the following reasons. First, at the present time, it is not clear to me how the lunar year stub will ever be exapanded to a full article. Second, the lunar year and lunar calendar are definitely related, and it doesn't seem too logical to discuss the lunar calendar without discussing the lunar year. Finally, I think that the merged article would be more informative. Nevertheless, If the lunar year and lunar calendar topics ever are expanded to the point where a division into two articles is warranted, I would also be for such a re-division. Lunokhod 15:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge - The two articles cover material that is similar enough that they should be merged together. Dr. Submillimeter 17:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * merge: the two concepts are closely related to each other and it's somewhat strange that lunar calendar doesn't mention lunar years in the text. Tocharianne 17:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)