Talk:Lunocet

Cleanup
This article is in need of cleanup - it reads rather like an advert for a product. Inline citations would be better than just listing a Scientific American article. The blog is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. There is nothing there to assert or establish the notability of the subject. Suggest that you start by studying Your first article. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with the above. The current article is unacceptable, and may not pass notablity requirements. I will cut the worst of the hype and see if I can find any supporting references. &bull; &bull; &bull; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 10:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have cleaned up what was there, but citations are proving difficult, as the links provided are broken, except for the Scientific American article, which provides very little.
 * There are blogs which contradict several of the claims, and list a whole lot of problems not mentioned in the article, but they are blogs, and not particularly suitable as citations. See: https://www.deeperblue.com/concerning-the-lunocet/
 * http://caw-designs.com/?page_id=1250 http://www.ultimateswimfin.com/ https://www.deeperblue.com/lunocet-pro-2015-review/ may be useful, if they are still there when needed. There has been a lot of development and the latest version is very different from the original. The 2009 SA article is very out of date. &bull; &bull; &bull; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 12:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Lunocet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110316003318/http://www.lunocet.com:80/blog/ to http://www.lunocet.com/blog/
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130815064736/http://caw-designs.com:80/?page_id=460 to http://caw-designs.com/?page_id=460

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Spam
This article is pure product spam. There's a grand total of one reliable source, the rest is straight from the manufacturer. I think it should be deleted and replaced with a non-brand-identifying sentence in monofin. Orpheus (talk) 02:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)