Talk:Lunt-Fontanne Theatre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 02:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

This is another article on New York theatres by Epicgenius and so, if my experience to anything to go by, is likely to be close to Good Article status already. I will start my review soon. simongraham (talk) 02:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments
This is a stable and well-written article. 96.6% of authorship is by Epicgenius. It is currently ranked B class and was a DYK nomination on 11 December, passed ten days later.


 * The article is of reasonable length with 4,646 words of readable prose, plus a referenced list of notable productions and an infobox.
 * It is written in a summary style, consistent with relevant Manuals of Style.
 * Citations seem to be thorough, although some seem a bit excessive. For example, there are two contemporary references for the fact that the ceiling mural was "painted by Edward Melcarth". Do you think it is worth removing some of the instances where there are similar duplications?
 * When expanding this article, I made sure not to run afoul of the essay WP:CITEKILL, so each given claim only has up to three direct references. The Melcarth reference, for example, only has two references, but the NY Times reference was only tangential, so I have removed it. I've cleaned up a few other instances of this. Epicgenius (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Good work. simongraham (talk) 20:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * All references appear to be from reputable sources.
 * Images have suitable Creative Commons or Public Domain licenses. Four of them are provided by Epicgenius. Thank you for including them as they definitely add to the article.
 * Earwig's Copyvio Detector identifies a 21.9% chance of copyright violation with IBDB. The overlap seems to be mainly the listing of shows. Please can you check and confirm.
 * I have confirmed that most of these are show listings. Epicgenius (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * "In the auditorium, the two levels of balconies were removed and a single balcony level was installed, accommodating 700 seats." Consider adding a comma after "removed"
 * Done. Epicgenius (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I cannot see any other obvious grammar and spelling issues.

Please take a look at my comments above. simongraham (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments. I have addressed all the issues you've brought up. Epicgenius (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Excellent work. I will complete the assessment. simongraham (talk) 20:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Assessment
The six good article criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonable well written.
 * the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
 * it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * all inline citations are from reliable sources;
 * it contains no original research;
 * it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
 * 1) It has a neutral point of view.
 * it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
 * images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Congratulations, Epicgenius. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

Pass simongraham (talk) 20:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)