Talk:Lusty Lady

Good Article nomination has failed
The Good article nomination for has failed
 * The article is close, but misses some of the criteria for a good article. Bugmuncher 06:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

1. It is well written. In this respect:
 * (a) it has compelling prose, and is readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;
 * ALMOST - could use some tweaks here and there. It needs to flow a bit better.
 * (b) it follows a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects; where appropriate, it contains a succinct lead section summarising the topic, and the remaining text is organised into a system of hierarchical sections (particularly for longer articles);
 * MOSTLY, but the lead doesn't addresss the scope of the article.
 * (c) it follows the Wikipedia Manual of Style;
 * AS FAR AS I CAN TELL - I am no style expert yet. (My specialty is leads...)
 * (d) necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided.
 * YES

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect:
 * (a) it provides references to any and all sources used for its material;
 * YES
 * (b) the citation of its sources is essential, and the use of inline citations is desirable, although not mandatory;
 * The newspaper articles should include bylines, and all web sources cited should include retrieval dates. see WP:CITE
 * (c) sources should be selected in accordance with the guidelines for reliable sources;
 * YES
 * (d) it contains no elements of original research.
 * YES

3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.
 * I think so

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. In this respect:
 * (a) viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias;
 * YES
 * (b) all significant points of view are fairly presented, but not asserted, particularly where there are or have been conflicting views on the topic.
 * YES

5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars.
 * I did not check this.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. In this respect:
 * (a) the images are tagged and have succinct and descriptive captions;
 * NEEDS BETTER CAPTION - See WP:CAPTION for advice.
 * (b) a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.

This is pretty close! Maybe I'll contribute some changes myself tomorrow after I wake up...Bugmuncher 06:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Millennium
The reference to Lusty Lady in the TV series pilot Millennium was deleted as "pointless trivia". The section header, "Miscellaneous", was indeed ill-conceived, and I changed it to "Popular culture references". Other than that, I don't see how removal of this fact helps our readers: we should let the judgement of whether this trivia is pointless or not confidently up to them. The trivia lacked a source, so I added one. AxelBoldt 03:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Lusty Lady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060715194426/http://www.lustyladysf.com/history/index.html to http://www.lustyladysf.com/history/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070112034937/http://www.seattleweekly.com/arts/0250/arts-greenblatt.php to http://www.seattleweekly.com/arts/0250/arts-greenblatt.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719174455/http://www.lustyladysf.com/events/index.html to http://www.lustyladysf.com/events/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070112033522/http://www.seattleweekly.com/arts/0207/arts-clement.php to http://www.seattleweekly.com/arts/0207/arts-clement.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060411082154/http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0613/lusty-lady.php to http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0613/lusty-lady.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051225161548/http://www.raintaxi.com/online/1998spring/lusty.shtml to http://www.raintaxi.com/online/1998spring/lusty.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090916051409/http://www.lustyladysf.com/history.html to http://www.lustyladysf.com/history.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090507212924/http://archive.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/10/09/burana/index.html to http://archive.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/10/09/burana/index.html
 * Added tag to http://www.livenudegirlsunite.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lusty Lady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090324120703/http://www.twistedpine.org/seattleuntimely/seattle_untimely_lusty_lady.php5 to http://www.twistedpine.org/seattleuntimely/seattle_untimely_lusty_lady.php5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)