Talk:Luther Cressman

"Useless" template
I'm not sure if the removal of the template is a case of WP:POINT, though deeming it useless is rather uncivil. The nofootnotes template has a legitimate usage. Though the article is quite short, there is a list of references almost as long. If these aren't actually being used to back up facts in the article per WP:CITE, they should probably be moved to a "Further reading" section. Citing each fact in the article with in-text citations now will also make it easier when the article is added to by future editors. I'd like to hear why the template is useless. Latr, Katr 17:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luther Cressman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071018203212/http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/information/biography/abcde/cressman_luther.html to http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/information/biography/abcde/cressman_luther.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)