Talk:Luxury goods/Archives/2014

Stylistic Concerns
This article is not encyclopedic in nature. For example, it does not contain an expository introduction. One of the first concerns should be to fix the style and determine what the article should talk about. It very well may serve best as a list page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.189.9.93 (talk) 05:35, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Definition
At Luxury tax, a Luxury good is defined as products not considered essential.

A Luxury good is defined as such independent on its price. I can buy a movie ticket and that should be considered Luxury as it is not essential.

I am going to change the definition if nobody disagrees. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.127.207.152 (talk) 10:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I found a better definition: "Luxury products have more than necessary and ordinary characteristics compared to other products of their category, which include their relatively high level of price, quality, aesthetics, rarity, extraordinariness, and symbolic meaning." I'm going to change the first part, if there are no complaints... --ArcticAlfons (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I put forth a definition that a luxury good is a product in which more than one of its characteristics (e.g. price, perceived quality, materials, etc.) exceed the general level of featured characteristics found on similar products. 68.227.54.95 (talk) 19:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)