Talk:Lycium barbarum

"Most common English name"
I'm not sure where the current information as to "the most common English name" has come from. It's certainly not the common name in the UK (where it's called Duke of Argyll's tea plant") or in North America (where it's called matrimony vine). MeegsC (talk) 22:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This claim is unsourced; I've removed the whole paragraph which adds nothing to the article as it is. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Lycium barbarum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061231112217/http://www.worldwatch.org/node/3887 to http://www.worldwatch.org/node/3887
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019183130/http://www.tibetinfonet.net/content/update/124 to http://www.tibetinfonet.net/content/update/124
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090108212607/http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/corncrake/corncrake/cornb146.html to http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/corncrake/corncrake/cornb146.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090720015211/http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2003/030115b.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2003/030115b.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080603012504/http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2008/080430b.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2008/080430b.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Native Range Updated
I have updated the native range to China, from the plurality of existing references. No new references were added. The old reference can be reconciled if it refers to the present-day, naturalized range. Facial (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Uncommon names
This edit and this revert were justified to remove a host of names either used in marketing or concocted by non-WP:RS sources. If we don't have rigorous secondary sources for such names, they don't need to be in the article. Zefr (talk) 23:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)