Talk:Lydia Gromyko

third party view
@Dark4tune Then I will ask whether or not this sourced statement is redundant to another user. Egeymi (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Dark4tune you could not impose your own view, instead please refer to any WP rule which qualifies this statement as redundant. If you will not provide any rule, then I will report it to take others' views about it. --Egeymi (talk) 16:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Go ahead, let's see what they have to say about it. Dark4tune (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, but why did not you refer to any WP rule about this statement.--Egeymi (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Because you did not refer to any WP rules first. Dark4tune (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

About the Third Opinion request: The request made at Third Opinion has been removed (i.e. declined). Like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, Third Opinion requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. Discussion requires back and forth responses about the substance of the dispute. The only response here by Dark4tune is about the 3O, not about the substance of the matter in dispute. Note that discussion in edit comments will not suffice. If an editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which are made here. — TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 18:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)