Talk:Lynch law

Merger?
There has been a proposal to merge this with Lynching in the United States. Actually I think a better solution would be to delete Lynch law and redirect to lynching in the U.S. There is no content here that isn't already in the other article.--Bcrowell 23:49, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * While there is clearly no need for both articles to persist separately, it is a misconception that 'lynch law' would only apply to the US, see for example [| 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica on Lynch law]. Therefore the general parts are best moved to the general article on lynching, to which the reditect must go; by definition only specific historical US elements belong in Lynching in the US Fastifex 06:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)