Talk:Lynn Riggs

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lynn Riggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004150007/http://www.okfriends.net/riggs.htm to http://www.okfriends.net/riggs.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004150025/http://www.okfriends.net/index.htm to http://www.okfriends.net/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lynn Riggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090413060241/http://members.cox.net/lynn.riggs/LynnRiggs.htm to http://members.cox.net/lynn.riggs/LynnRiggs.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120814130659/http://lynnriggs.atspace.cc/index.htm to http://lynnriggs.atspace.cc/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Revert
This edit claims that two versions of the infobox present "exactly the same information". However, a comparison of the two shows that this is not the case, with the current version omitting genres of work and instead presenting a single (comparatively minor) point from the subject's extensive employment history. The subject is noted primarily for writing, not for teaching English for a year; the former presentation is thus more appropriate. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The listing of incredibly broad genres is pretty meaningless as most writers write different kinds of things, adds no real information, and looks amateurish. Gamaliel  ( talk ) 22:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The listing shows the scope of the subject's work at a glance. However, even if you feel genre should be omitted, that does not address the issues with regards to employment history. Additionally, typically alma mater is not included for non-graduates, and I don't see a reason not to identify prominently why Green Grow the Lilacs is considered significant. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)