Talk:Lynn Zechiedrich

Subject not notable enough for page.
This page appears to be some professors CV, and is not worthy of a Wikipedia page. 2600:1700:F2F0:43B0:BDA2:2528:7A6C:EA8A (talk) 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Article appears to be self-aggrandizing
Articles tone and structure appears to include a lot of subjective and exaggerated material, often grandiose. Often, shared accomplishments like patents are written to sound as if she was the sole inventor, and the “Flutist” section is bizzare.

The subject is also simply one of many tens of thousands of professors, and many of the awards and honors are minor or typical. The entire thing reads like a resume rather than an article about a notable individual. 2600:1700:F2F0:43B0:BDA2:2528:7A6C:EA8A (talk) 05:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Article should be considered for deletion
Agreeing with the other reviewers here, this page reads largley as a CV. The fact the whole page was not deleted during the removal of the "flutist" section is strange. While Zechiedrich appears to be an accomplished investigator the article appears to be self written or self-promotional at best. RickAndMortise (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)