Talk:Lynne Williams (educator)

Requested move 17 April 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 21:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Lynne Williams → Lynne Williams (educator) – No indication that the stub delineating the Australian music educator is primary over the stub for the American Lynne Williams (politician). The main title header Lynne Williams should redirect to the Lynn Williams disambiguation page. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 21:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Leave where it is or move to : Lynne Williams (politician) does not seem very notable and could perhaps be deleted. My impression is that "(educator)" is rather rare on Wikipedia, and it also does not seem like an accurate description her most notable roles (e.g. for the 2012 Olympic Games). I suggest to consider "(administrator)", which is how she is referred to at https://honours.pmc.gov.au/honours/awards/2002391. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I would support the alternative proposal Lynne Williams → Lynne Williams (administrator) or any other reasonable qualifier that subsequent participants may suggest. As far as the politician's notability is concerned, both women's entries are stubs and the politician is a member of her state legislature and thus would appear to be sufficiently notable per WP:NPOL. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Support. No primary topic. There's nothing wrong with "educator". We usually try to avoid "administrator" as far too generic. Lynne Williams (arts administrator) would be okay. The politician definitely meets WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * In that case, I don't object to the original proposal. Lynne Williams (arts administrator) also seems good. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support as proposed. The first sentence says she's an educator. "Arts administrator" is overly precise. Station1 (talk) 20:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)