Talk:Lysaker Station/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lysaker Station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for the review; you have been doing an impressive job at the GA reviews the last few days. I have rewritten those sections you have pointed out. If they need more work just shout out, I tend to get rather blind to my own prose. convert added. As for a real picture, I fear that there is none here, on the commons, or any other place I can find them free; I live some 600 km away so I can't just go down and take snapshot (I would if it was in town). Arsenikk (talk)  23:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for the review; you have been doing an impressive job at the GA reviews the last few days. I have rewritten those sections you have pointed out. If they need more work just shout out, I tend to get rather blind to my own prose. convert added. As for a real picture, I fear that there is none here, on the commons, or any other place I can find them free; I live some 600 km away so I can't just go down and take snapshot (I would if it was in town). Arsenikk (talk)  23:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review; you have been doing an impressive job at the GA reviews the last few days. I have rewritten those sections you have pointed out. If they need more work just shout out, I tend to get rather blind to my own prose. convert added. As for a real picture, I fear that there is none here, on the commons, or any other place I can find them free; I live some 600 km away so I can't just go down and take snapshot (I would if it was in town). Arsenikk (talk)  23:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review; you have been doing an impressive job at the GA reviews the last few days. I have rewritten those sections you have pointed out. If they need more work just shout out, I tend to get rather blind to my own prose. convert added. As for a real picture, I fear that there is none here, on the commons, or any other place I can find them free; I live some 600 km away so I can't just go down and take snapshot (I would if it was in town). Arsenikk (talk)  23:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I made a few changes for comprehension. Overall though, I think it meets the GA criteria now. &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 17:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)