Talk:Máire Rua O'Brien

Soldiers in 1660s
The but about them being in it in the 1660s. Is just to show they were in it

Nothing's wrong with that Clonloumbog123 (talk) 15:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes. There is. As per my recent note on your user talk page, there absolutely is something wrong with morphing a source which states "soldiers were stationed on and off Lemenagh during the 1660s" to "O' Brien had affairs with soldiers stationed on and off Lemenagh during the 1660s". As per my note, the source states that soldiers were stationed there. It does NOT SUPPORT the claim or suggestion that the subject had affairs with any or all of them. Claiming otherwise is a nonsense. Guliolopez (talk) 16:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Portrait of Marie rua
How do I add another portrait of her from dromoland castle Spookywitch1234 (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Cooper death
Hi. To the contributor (editing from several usernames/IPs) who seems insistent on extrapolating from a limited set of sources (and doing so in a way which relies entirely on OR and synth) that John Cooper predeceased the subject, I would draw your attention to the source you have yourself added. Specifically, the Inchiquin papers collection catalogued and stored by the National Library of Ireland. And, in particular, manuscript number 45.301/2 in that collection. This manuscript is reputedly a letter, dated 17 December 1689, from the same John Cooper. To his son-in-law Richard Wilson. If John Cooper was dead by 1686, then what is he doing writing letters to family in 1689? Dead men may not tell tales, but they certainly don't write letters. It is a matter of verifiable record that John Cooper did not pre-decease the subject. Inventing reasons to claim otherwise is not helpful. Stop adding this stuff. And stop using multiple profiles to do so. Escalation next. Guliolopez (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2020 (UTC)