Talk:Māui dolphin

check this please
In biological classification, subspecies (abbreviated "subsp." or "ssp."; plural: "subspecies") is either a taxonomic rank subordinate to species, or a taxonomic unit in that rank. A subspecies cannot be recognized in isolation: a species will either be recognized as having no subspecies at all or two or more (including any that are extinct), never just one. []mozasaur (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

It is arbitary whether the clasification of a subspecies within a species then makes the rest of that a subspecies as well. In this case Maui's dolphins have been recognised as a subspecies since 2002 and are Cephalorhynchus hectori maui. Previously they were Hector's and known as Cephalorhynchus hectori along with all the other Hector's. Now that Maui's have been made a subspecies some scientists now refer to the non Maui's Hectors as another subspecies - Cephalorhynchus hectori hectori. While this trinomial is consitent with the purpose of the Linnaeus devised system of clasification, refering to Hector's as a subspecies based on this does imply there is no Hector's species in isolation and creates other inconsistences in species reference. In other words, whether the South Island Hector's dolphins are a called a subspecies or not is really dependent on the purpose for which the writer is describing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damaclia (talk • contribs) 22:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Photo's
There's a segment on the evening news about these dolphins right now (literally, as I am typing) I have never seen a dolphin like this, and I daresay most people haven't either. I came to Wikipedia, since I was already here, to get a better picture only to be very disappointed. This beautiful species needs a far better picture than what is available, especially given that what is here currently barely shows the dorsal fin. 220.233.34.248 (talk) 07:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed move to Māui dolphin
"Māui dolphin", without the possessive apostrophe, has become the standard usage by authorities in 2017. The dolphins are not named after a person (Māui) but after a place – the North Island of New Zealand, or Te Ika-a-Māui in Māori – note the macron is the correct spelling, in line with the increasing use of macronised Māori words in New Zealand English. The confusion has probably arisen because the other subspecies is Hector's dolphin, named after James Hector. Around 2013, when the majority of this page was edited, prevailing usage was "Maui's dolphin" (see the IUCN listing and this 2012 Conservation Genetics paper) but the Department of Conservation has changed usage since then, and WWF have followed suit; many of the references added around 2013 now redirect to "Māui dolphin" pages. Because Wikipedia is obliged to take account of shifts in usage, as well as reflect "correct" usage as decided by authorities like DOC, I suggest it's time to rename this article. Comments? Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 21:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Another possibility would be to move the page to the scientific name - Cephalorhynchus hectori maui - as was done for Leptospermum scoparium (aka. mānuka, manuka, tea tree, etc.), Austroderia (aka. toetoe) and many other species. This would make it stable, and would likely be uncontroversial.  (Then, just have redirects to it from the various possible English names, as usual.) Ross Finlayson (talk) 12:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:FAUNA suggests using the most common name where possible, which in this case would be the English name, unless that's problematic. For example, toetoe refers to several different species, and is also commonly misspelled toitoi. Mānuka is just one of several common names, and which is the most common depends on whether it's growing in NZ or Australia. In both of those cases, using the Latin names make sense (again, as per WP:FAUNA) (Incidentally in my experience with NZ flora and fauna pages, Latin names are actually not especially stable, and are often extremely controversial!) Māui dolphins are continually in the news under that name, and not the Latin name, so continuing to use a common name and updating it to reflect changed usage in this case seems best.—Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 05:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, good point. (FYI, there's also WP:FLORA, for plants.) Ross Finlayson (talk) 09:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's interesting; WP:FLORA seems much more inclined towards Latin names. Thanks for pointing that out. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 11:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)